Skip to content
SG_SYMBOL_lgborder_RGB_lightgrey_trans_(2) 2
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Workshop
  • Consulting
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Workshop
  • Consulting
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Workshops
    • April 2026 Perth Workshop
    • General Company Workshop
  • Consulting
  • Home
  • Blog
  • Workshops
    • April 2026 Perth Workshop
    • General Company Workshop
  • Consulting

Sectional Interpretation

A recipe for shrinking a mineral resource by 90%

By Jun Cowan | 22/01/2016 | 0

How can a mineral resource be downgraded by 90%? This is a simple explanation most geologists are not aware of.

Read More

The myth of sectional geological modelling: Part 2

By Jun Cowan | 12/03/2013 | 0

I outline the quickest way to model geology in 3D, but it’s controversial and the discussion may offend the majority of academic economic geologists!

Read More

The myth of sectional geological modelling: Part 1

By Jun Cowan | 11/03/2013 | 0

“Interpreting in section and in plan is the most reliable way we can understand the geology of the deposit.”, or is this statement a myth?

Read More

Is sectional digitisation in geological modelling still considered “industry best practice”?

By Jun Cowan | 02/10/2012 | 0

For geological modelling, resource geologists generally favour the use of sectionally hand-digitised wireframe models for resource estimation, but in 2012 is this still considered industry best practice? Jun Cowan, the conceptual founder of Leapfrog software, discusses this issue with a familiar example.

Read More

Recent Posts

  • What do Perkins Discontinuities look like in the field?
  • The Geology of Self-Belief
  • The Forgotten Tool That Shaped Leapfrog
  • The Outside-In Method—Herding Geologists Toward a Better Gold Model
  • Kinematic Grooves & Tectonic Moves: The Brett ‘K-Matic’ Davis Method

Recent Comments

    SG_SYMBOL_lgborder_RGB_lightgrey_trans_(2) 2

    Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy
    All Rights Reserved StructuralGeology.com 2025