Leapfrog Mining Model
Five things about Leapfrog Geo that mean I will continue to use Leapfrog Mining
Two years after Leapfrog Geo’s release in Feb 2013, Ron Reid discusses TOP 5 reasons why the original Leapfrog Mining still continues to be the better Leapfrog software for most mining and exploration related work.
Read MoreThe devolution of the Leapfrog drawing tool – a lesson in designing disruptive technology: Part 2
The 3D drawing tool in Leapfrog released in 2004 cannot be faulted from a technical standpoint. So why wasn’t it included in the next generation of Leapfrog software, Leapfrog Geo?
Read MoreThe devolution of the Leapfrog drawing tool – a lesson in designing disruptive technology: Part 1
The revolutionary 3D drawing tool in Leapfrog released in 2004—is all but forgotten a decade later. Why this happened is a lesson to all software companies that develop and introduce something new to an established market.
Read MoreCreating a wireframe from a set of points ‒ Part 1
Ron Reid outlines in Part 1 of a two part post how to construct a 3D object from a set of points that are not connected to each other using Leapfrog Mining and Leapfrog Geo.
Read MoreBasic grade interpolation in Leapfrog
How do you run a good grade interpolation using Leapfrog Mining? Ron Reid provides some solid practical advice as a geologist working in the mining industry.
Read MoreRest In Peace Topographic Contours – Part 2
If you shouldn’t use topographic contours for 3D modelling, then what should you use? In this blog post, I show the superiority of 3D interpolation by contrasting the stark difference between 2D and 3D interpolated LIDAR surfaces.
Read More1001 reasons why Leapfrog Mining is still better than Leapfrog Geo
In marketing, you put forward the positives and spin the negatives into a more favourable light. Unless of course there is a big negative that is too heavy to spin.
Read MoreThe myth of sectional geological modelling: Part 2
I outline the quickest way to model geology in 3D, but it’s controversial and the discussion may offend the majority of academic economic geologists!
Read MoreThe myth of sectional geological modelling: Part 1
“Interpreting in section and in plan is the most reliable way we can understand the geology of the deposit.”, or is this statement a myth?
Read MoreRest In Peace Topographic Contours
Notwithstanding the nearly 200-year history of topographic contours, in today’s post I’ll question the usefulness of topographic contours in the context of 3D geological modelling. WARNING: Some of you, who have grown up using maps and GIS software, might consider the content of this post blasphemous!
Read MoreBoundary Analysis in Leapfrog
How do you decide whether to make a fault boundary hard or soft? Geologist Ron Reid, who is an Orefind-trained veteran Leapfrog user, explains how to do this effectively in Leapfrog Mining software.
Read MoreWill Gemcom produce a Leaped Frog out of Leapfrog?
Gemcom recently announced the ‘Dynamic Shells’ update to their Surpac software, which is described as a fast implicit modeller. This is a module that jumps and croaks like Leapfrog, and regardless of whether it actually works like Leapfrog is a moot point. It doesn’t really matter because in marketing, it’s all about perception.
Read MoreIs sectional digitisation in geological modelling still considered “industry best practice”?
For geological modelling, resource geologists generally favour the use of sectionally hand-digitised wireframe models for resource estimation, but in 2012 is this still considered industry best practice? Jun Cowan, the conceptual founder of Leapfrog software, discusses this issue with a familiar example.
Read More